Side-by-Side Comparison
Five scenarios run through Delphi, MoReBench, and MHF under two parameterizations. See exactly where flat approaches lose the thread and hierarchy adds structure.
Explore comparison →Practical Summary
What each approach gives you, what it misses, and where MHF fills the gaps. Haidt profile divergence, feature matrix, and The Bottom Line.
Read summary →55-Scenario Scorecard
Every scenario scored across 5 frameworks: MHF Christian, MHF Secular, MHF Gert, flat rubric, and Delphi-style. Filter by category, expand for detail.
View scorecard →Try It Yourself
Explore 5 pre-loaded scenarios interactively. See stakeholders, constraints, recommendations under Christian and Secular parameterizations, and moral residue.
Explore scenarios →Methodology Deep Dive
How Christian weights are derived from scripture vs how secular weights come from crowdworker data. Why the numbers don't compare directly. Full Rai/Fiske analysis.
Read methodology →AITA Dataset
Reddit "Am I The Asshole" corpus. Real moral dilemmas with community verdicts. Used for secular baseline weight calibration and stakeholder extraction validation.
View details →UniMoral Dataset
Unified moral judgment dataset combining multiple sources. Provides cross-dataset validation for MHF's constraint satisfaction scores.
View details →Pew Surveys
Pew Research Center moral attitudes data. Grounds the framework's community-level parameterization -- how real populations weight moral foundations differently.
View details →Hypotheses Overview
The core claims: hierarchy-aware evaluation produces materially different scores, LLMs converge on low-dimensional moral reasoning, and relational graphs surface missing stakeholders.
View hypotheses →Hypotheses Detail
Detailed results from the variance experiment (Round 12), perturbation tests (25 pairs, 5 families), and three-way parameterization comparison (Christian vs. Secular vs. Gert).
View details →Graph Architecture
The relational DAG structure: nodes (stakeholders), edges (obligations), Haidt-space weights, and constraint propagation mechanics. Interactive graph explorer.
Explore graph →Weight Profiles
Christian and secular weight profiles side by side. Authority at 10x, Sanctity at 13.6x -- the dimensions that drive divergence, grounded in Haidt's empirical work.
Compare weights →